The Honest Answer: What Jaques Did and Did Not Do

Jaques of London did not invent table tennis in the strict sense of conjuring the game from nothing. What the company did, around 1891, was take a loose cluster of after-dinner improvisation already happening in Victorian drawing rooms and give it commercial shape: named equipment, printed rules, and a box a family could carry to a friend's house. That act of formalisation matters enormously in games history, even if it falls short of pure invention. The fairest answer is this: Jaques was the first company to manufacture and sell table tennis as a recognisable, packaged product, which is a significant and documented contribution, but the underlying idea of hitting a lightweight ball across a makeshift net on a dining table predates those boxes by a decade or more, and nobody holds a clear patent on the concept itself.

For parents, that distinction is actually the interesting part. A game that emerged from improvisation, that had multiple names and no single founding genius, that was shaped gradually by ordinary people batting a cork around after supper: that is a more human story than a lone inventor's eureka moment, and it is, as we shall see, precisely the kind of layered narrative that developmental research suggests children benefit from hearing.

Victorian Drawing Rooms and the First Recorded Game: Where the Story Really Begins

The earliest documented accounts of table tennis place the game in British upper-middle-class homes in the 1880s. The equipment was entirely improvised: a row of books formed the net, a rounded champagne cork or a rubber ball served as the projectile, and cigar-box lids or the backs of old books became bats. The game had no agreed name. It was played for amusement after dinner, in the warm lamplight of a Victorian dining room, by people who wanted the sensation of lawn tennis without stepping outside into the English weather. That origin story, unglamorous and pleasingly practical, is well supported by contemporary accounts.

By the late 1880s and very early 1890s, manufacturers began to see commercial potential. Jaques, already nearly a century old by that point, having been established in 1795, and already the company that had codified croquet in 1851 and brought the Staunton chess set to the world in 1849, applied the same instinct it had always had: to take a game people were already playing informally and give it lasting, quality form.

On narrative and early learning

Psychologist Alison Gopnik's research into how young children build mental models of the world consistently finds that embedding facts inside stories, rather than presenting them as isolated information, significantly improves both retention and understanding. A game with a history is not a lesson to be endured; it is a story to be inhabited.

"Gossima," "Whiff-Whaff," and the Name That Stuck: How Table Tennis Got Its Identity

Jaques's first packaged version of the game was sold under the name Gossima, a word with no obvious etymology, possibly coined simply to sound exotic. It did not catch on. A rival name, Whiff-Whaff, enjoyed brief currency and captures something true about the game: the light, percussive sound of a celluloid ball meeting a bat. Neither name survived. The name "Ping-Pong" was trademarked by Jaques around 1901 and later sold to the American manufacturer Parker Brothers, which is why international bodies eventually settled on "table tennis" as the neutral, legally uncomplicated alternative. The International Table Tennis Federation was founded in 1926, by which point the game had spread across Europe, been adopted in Japan and China, and begun its transformation into an Olympic sport.

Children find the rejected names delightful. Whiff-Whaff in particular tends to produce the kind of helpless laughter that is, according to neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp's work on the PLAY system, a genuine marker of joyful engagement rather than mere politeness. Telling a four-year-old that a game was nearly called Whiff-Whaff forever is, in its small way, an act of generous parenting.

Separating Myth from Documented Fact: The Contested Origins of a Beloved Game

The history of table tennis is genuinely contested among sports historians, and that is worth acknowledging plainly. Some accounts point to a David Foster patent from 1890 for a "Parlour Table Games" set that included a form of table tennis. Jaques's own commercial launch of Gossima is typically dated to 1891. The honest position is that several people and companies were circling the same idea at roughly the same moment, as so often happens with inventions. Jaques was the most successful in making the game commercially available and, crucially, in creating the equipment standard that subsequent manufacturers would follow.

On play and cognitive development

Researchers Hirsh-Pasek and Golinkoff, whose body of work on playful learning spans decades, argue that games with rule structures, even simple ones, support the development of executive function in young children. A game as old as table tennis, with rules refined across more than a century, offers a particularly well-tested scaffold for that kind of learning.

Why Telling Children a True, Complicated Story Is Better Than a Neat One

There is a parental instinct to simplify, to say "Jaques invented it" and move on. Developmental research suggests that resisting this instinct, at least partially, is worthwhile. Vygotsky's concept of the zone of proximal development implies that children grow most when gently stretched beyond what they already know, and a story with genuine complexity, handled warmly and at the right pace, does exactly that. You do not need to lecture a toddler about trademark law. You simply say: lots of people were playing a game a bit like this, then one company made it properly, and nobody could quite agree on what to call it. That is enough. It is true, and it is interesting.

Suskind's work on language-rich environments adds another layer: the vocabulary of history, words like "invented," "designed," "changed," and "decided," builds the kind of abstract conceptual framework that supports literacy and reasoning long before school begins.

From Narrative to Play: How Heritage Adds Meaning When You Pick Up a Paddle Together

There is a practical warmth to knowing that the game you are playing with your child has been played, in recognisably the same form, by families for well over a hundred years. Pellegrini's research on adult-child play consistently finds that shared attention and joint engagement, rather than skill level, are what make play developmental. History is one very natural way to create shared attention: you are both curious about something, you are both a little uncertain about the exact truth, and you are both about to find out together.

That quality of mutual discovery is, as Gopnik describes it, one of the defining features of how children learn best. A parent who says "I'm not entirely sure who invented this, let's look it up later" is modelling intellectual honesty. A parent who adds "but the company that made it first has been making games since 1795" is giving a child a sense of human scale, of time and continuity, that no worksheet can replicate.

Explore Jaques traditional games, including those with the longest histories

Objects With Stories: The Case for Traditional Games Worth Handing Down

One of the quieter arguments for traditional games over disposable plastic alternatives is precisely this narrative quality. A game that has existed across generations carries meaning in its design. The weight of a well-made bat, the particular sound of a ball, the ritual of setting up a net: these are not arbitrary details but the residue of decades of refinement. Dauch and colleagues, studying object play in toddlers, found that simpler, open-ended objects prompted longer and more creative play sessions than highly prescriptive plastic toys. Traditional games occupy an interesting middle ground: they have rules, which provides structure, but they reward physical skill and social negotiation rather than battery-powered instruction.

For a company that has been making games since 1795, this is not a marketing position but a design philosophy accumulated across generations. Jaques games were made to last, to be passed down, and to accumulate exactly the kind of family story that makes an object matter.

Browse the full Jaques games collection, from parlour classics to garden favourites

Common Questions

Did Jaques of London actually invent table tennis, or is that a marketing claim?

It sits between the two. Jaques was the first to manufacture and sell a packaged, commercially available version of the game, around 1891, initially under the name Gossima. Informal versions existed in British homes before that point, and other inventors were filing related patents at roughly the same time. Jaques's genuine contribution was formalisation, equipment standardisation, and commercial distribution, which shaped every subsequent version of the game. That is a real and significant role in games history, but it is more accurate to say Jaques defined table tennis than that it invented the concept wholesale.

My four-year-old won't understand Victorian history, so is there any point in sharing it?

A great deal of point, handled appropriately. You are not aiming for comprehension of Victorian social structure; you are offering a sentence or two of wonder. "This game has been played for longer than great-great-grandma was alive" is sufficient, true, and meaningful at four. Gopnik's research suggests that children this age are building their first frameworks for understanding time and causation, and small, vivid historical details, especially funny ones like the name Whiff-Whaff, are precisely the kind of anchor that makes those frameworks stick. The goal is not a history lesson; it is a shared moment of curiosity.

At what age can children genuinely engage with the idea that a game has a long story behind it?

Earlier than most parents expect, though the form of engagement changes with age. Toddlers respond to the emotional register of storytelling, the wonder in your voice, rather than the content. By around three, children can grasp simple sequencing: "first people played with corks, then someone made proper bats." By four and five, the idea that a game was called something silly and then renamed is genuinely funny and comprehensible. Vygotsky's framework suggests that the key is pitching just slightly above current understanding, with an adult present to bridge the gap. You do not need to wait until school age to begin.

Are there other Jaques games with similarly fascinating histories that we could explore as a family?

Several. Jaques codified the rules of croquet in 1851 and has been associated with the Staunton chess set since 1849, both of which carry rich, debated, and genuinely surprising histories. Skittles, in various forms, has been played since medieval times and arguably longer. Ludo and Snakes and Ladders both have documented origins in ancient India that children find remarkable once they are old enough to grasp the timescale. The broader Jaques catalogue, spanning more than two centuries of games-making, offers a family an almost inexhaustible supply of "did you know" moments to fold into play.

Real play starts with real toys

Shop Jaques London · Est. 1795

Britain's oldest toy maker. Every toy open-ended, wooden, and built for exactly the kind of play the research recommends.

Wooden ToysTraditional GamesShop All →